Mpowerplacement

Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: referall.us Federal staff members have until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually do not consider it a lot a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with a vague promise that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very misleading term to use in this scenario. When you think of a buyout, there’s some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete deal to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme care. There are no assurances contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for specific is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some category of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful because leaving earlier than planned can have serious effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is an excellent offer for individuals who don’t want to return to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is very kindly offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a way, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes since there are no guarantees. And these are people who like their job. They love the mission of the firm. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with very difficult choices, particularly if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so unmatched that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m not sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase firms to provide this variety of people administrative leave. So I believe it is quite perhaps setting the phase for obstacles since I feel OPM has significantly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site terms of use and consents pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR transcripts are produced on a rush due date by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its final type and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.